MATHS - 3.REDUCTIO-AD-ABSURDUM
Your Mother told “Don’t jump from a wall ! If you jump from a wall, you will break your bones”. This is a theorem to be proved. So let us prove it by assuming that the conclusion (to be proved ) is wrong. So jump from the wall.. you will break a bone…So our assumption is wrong….Hence the theorem is proved…
This is a method of proving a theorem by contradiction. We start by assuming that the conclusion (to be proved) is wrong. Then we end up with a contradiction to a known truth or the hypothesis (given data). Hence we conclude that our assumption is wrong….that is the theorem is correct.
This is a very powerful method with a wide variety of applications. You are aware of this method in solving theorems in geometry and in proving irrational numbers etc. Now let us see its application to a seemingly tough and not usually heard of problem but well within our scope.
You know a rational number as that which can be expressed as p / q where p and q are integers. You also know that square root of 2 is about 1.414….etc and it is an irrational number because it can not be expressed as p / q where p and q are integers. Now the question is can an irrational number raised to an irrational number power be a rational number ? In-fact the the theorem to be proved is that an irrational number raised to an irrational number power can be a rational number .
At the out set it looks baffling as we do not even know how to raise an irrational number to an irrational number without using logarithms or a calculator.
But let us remember that we have a powerful tool in REDCUTIO - AD – ABSURDUM . Let us put it to use .
Let us assume that the theorem is wrong .That is an irrational number raised to an irrational number power can not be a rational number .
We know square root of 2 is an irrational number. Let us raise it to again square root of 2 power. As per our assumption it is an irrational number. Now let us raise this irrational number to square root of 2 power which should once again be an irrational number as per our assumption.
Look now what we get …
[{(square root of 2)^sq.rt(2)}^sq.rt(2)] = [{sq.rt(2)} ^{sqrt(2)*sqrt(2)}] = [sqrt(2)]^2=2
We get 2 as the answer .
It is a perfectly rational number….even an integer….so our assumption is wrong . So the theorem that an irrational number raised to an irrational number power can be a rational number is correct. Got It ? How does it look ?
Now , one question about your understanding of this proof .What if that our first step , that is , square root of 2 raised to square root of 2 power is an irrational number is not correct ?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home